A tester ran Altworld's Hemmingway-1, a 27B fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B built for human-like writing, on a MacBook M5 Max at ~31.8 tok/s with thinking and MTP enabled. An LLM judge scored it 94.2 on role play and narrative, narrowly below one Qwen3.8-27B run (95.35), but side-by-side story samples read noticeably more like human fiction. The verdict: strong pick for fiction and everyday writing, while base Qwen remains the better generalist or coding assistant.
Altworld, a small lab based in Switzerland and South Africa, open-sourced Hemmingway-1, a 27B fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B specialized for creative writing and short-form personal text. The Apache-2.0 weights are on Hugging Face and the model is vLLM-compatible. It posts EQ-Bench 4 1330 and tops the lab's internal blind pairwise writing benchmarks against the frontier models tested.
Altworld, a small lab based in Switzerland and South Africa, open-sourced Hemmingway-1, a 27B fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B specialized for creative writing and short-form personal text. The Apache-2.0 weights are on Hugging Face and the model is vLLM-compatible. It posts EQ-Bench 4 1330 and tops the lab's internal blind pairwise writing benchmarks against the frontier models tested.
A user ran Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27b-oQ8e-mtp through llm-bench.io on an Apple M5 Max (64 GB, oMLX, thinking at xhigh) and compared it to base Qwen3.8 27B. Swift 1.5 generates far fewer tokens, cutting full benchmark runs from ~38 to ~24 minutes, while quality judged as a tie (85.8 vs 85.0). The user plans to try it as a daily driver.
A user ran Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27b-oQ8e-mtp through llm-bench.io on an Apple M5 Max (64 GB, oMLX, thinking at xhigh) and compared it to base Qwen3.8 27B. Swift 1.5 generates far fewer tokens, cutting full benchmark runs from ~38 to ~24 minutes, while quality judged as a tie (85.8 vs 85.0). The user plans to try it as a daily driver.
A user benchmarked Qwen3.8-27B on an M1 Max Mac Studio with 32GB unified memory, comparing MLX and llama.cpp as local inference runtimes. MLX delivered higher decode throughput (15.8 tok/s vs 9.7 tok/s), while llama.cpp showed faster prefill. The results matter to practitioners choosing runtimes for memory-constrained Apple Silicon local LLM serving.
A user benchmarked Qwen3.8-27B on an M1 Max Mac Studio with 32GB unified memory, comparing MLX and llama.cpp as local inference runtimes. MLX delivered higher decode throughput (15.8 tok/s vs 9.7 tok/s), while llama.cpp showed faster prefill. The results matter to practitioners choosing runtimes for memory-constrained Apple Silicon local LLM serving.
A LoRA fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B that makes the model converse in a casual, human-like tone instead of assistant speak. Version 2.0 fixes prior criticisms: functional tool calling, better instruction following, and more than a few words per reply. It targets local LLM users who dislike stiff assistant personalities.
A LoRA fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B that makes the model converse in a casual, human-like tone instead of assistant speak. Version 2.0 fixes prior criticisms: functional tool calling, better instruction following, and more than a few words per reply. It targets local LLM users who dislike stiff assistant personalities.
mlx-dspark, an MLX port of DeepSeek's DSpark speculative-decoding drafters, now supports Qwen3.8-27B via RadixArk's drafter, achieving up to ~3× speedups on Apple Silicon. Benchmarks on an M4 Pro show 2.45× mean speedup for 8-bit targets, with code runs hitting 3.18×.
mlx-dspark, an MLX port of DeepSeek's DSpark speculative-decoding drafters, now supports Qwen3.8-27B via RadixArk's drafter, achieving up to ~3× speedups on Apple Silicon. Benchmarks on an M4 Pro show 2.45× mean speedup for 8-bit targets, with code runs hitting 3.18×.