Releases·Tool Release
Turned my SOL --> LUNA workflow into a repo-native Codex methodology
A developer released TITAN (Technical Intelligence, Tasking & AI Navigation), an open-source methodology that encodes a Codex development workflow inside the repository itself. It assigns SOL to planning and architecture and LUNA to implementation, with project context persisted in .titan/ and docs/ files so decisions survive across sessions. It ships as an npm package and GitHub repo (v1.1.0) and targets long-running projects with real business rules.
3 engagement1 sourceSun, Sep 13, 2026, 09:52 PM
AI Overview
- Reddit user releases TITAN (Technical Intelligence, Tasking & AI Navigation) v1.1.0, an open-source Codex methodology where .titan/ and docs/ files in the repo carry state, roles, and plans
- TITAN assigns SOL to architecture and planning and LUNA to implementation, with a STOP rule making LUNA halt and report codebase/plan conflicts instead of redesigning
- The workflow separates UI tasks from backend logic and casts ASTRA as an optional critical reviewer for expensive decisions rather than a permanent agent
- Initialize with npx -y u/netelite/titan@latest; GitHub at github.com/netelite/titan
Related
Products·launched
Sol + Luna Codex orchestrator for stretching Codex usage limits
A GitHub setup that orchestrates OpenAI Codex models to reduce rate-limit burn: Sol handles planning and review, Luna does most implementation, Terra is a fallback for hard tasks. Sol breaks work into small, self-contained tasks for Luna. Aimed at Codex users hitting usage caps.
A GitHub setup that orchestrates OpenAI Codex models to reduce rate-limit burn: Sol handles planning and review, Luna does most implementation, Terra is a fallback for hard tasks. Sol breaks work into small, self-contained tasks for Luna. Aimed at Codex users hitting usage caps.
7 engagement1 sourceredditSun, Aug 30, 2026, 07:38 AM
Social·Community
Users report plan drift between Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 in Claude Code
Claude Code users are experiencing implementation drift when using Opus 5 for planning and Sonnet 5 for execution. The Sonnet 5 subagent often generates new plans on the fly instead of following the approved plan, leading to scope and structure changes. Users are seeking best practices to prevent this drift.
Claude Code users are experiencing implementation drift when using Opus 5 for planning and Sonnet 5 for execution. The Sonnet 5 subagent often generates new plans on the fly instead of following the approved plan, leading to scope and structure changes. Users are seeking best practices to prevent this drift.
02134 engagement3 sourcesredditSun, Jul 26, 2026, 09:44 PM
Social·Community
Users report SOL burns through Plus plan allowance quickly
A user on the $20 Plus plan reports that OpenAI's SOL model consumes their weekly allowance rapidly, contradicting claims that SOL is cheaper and offers more usable capacity than Fable. The user relies on Claude Code Max as their main driver and uses Codex as an adversarial reviewer.
A user on the $20 Plus plan reports that OpenAI's SOL model consumes their weekly allowance rapidly, contradicting claims that SOL is cheaper and offers more usable capacity than Fable. The user relies on Claude Code Max as their main driver and uses Codex as an adversarial reviewer.
10 engagement1 sourceredditWed, Jul 29, 2026, 05:22 AM
Social·Community
Codex users report Goals with Luna/High cuts costs, leaves bugs
A Codex user reports that running Goals with Luna/High is effective and cheap, using SOL for planning and bug fixes. The workflow leaves a few bugs at the end but avoids killing 15% of the plan, making it a regular practice.
A Codex user reports that running Goals with Luna/High is effective and cheap, using SOL for planning and bug fixes. The workflow leaves a few bugs at the end but avoids killing 15% of the plan, making it a regular practice.
10 engagement1 sourceredditFri, Aug 21, 2026, 09:16 PM
Social·Community
Codex user builds 'development factory' dashboard running LLM-driven plans from design doc to finished code
A Codex user describes a self-built 'development factory': a dashboard that turns design documents into phased implementation plans, sequences them into work packages, and executes code phase by phase with LLM calls via the Codex app-server. It shows practitioners how to wrap models in deterministic validation and human approval gates for consistency on long-running projects.
A Codex user describes a self-built 'development factory': a dashboard that turns design documents into phased implementation plans, sequences them into work packages, and executes code phase by phase with LLM calls via the Codex app-server. It shows practitioners how to wrap models in deterministic validation and human approval gates for consistency on long-running projects.
18 engagement1 sourceredditFri, Sep 11, 2026, 11:18 PM