A post announces Claude Sonnet 5.5, priced identically to Sonnet 5 at $2/$10 per million tokens. Thinking is always on by default, though developers can use the `between_tools` option to disable upfront thinking. A migration guide is available for teams moving from Sonnet 5.
Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family, positioning it as a faster, lower-cost complement to Opus 5.5 for well-scoped coding and knowledge work. The company says it runs over 30% faster than Sonnet 5 and effectively costs up to 30% less per task despite identical per-token pricing, and it is the first Sonnet subject to the cybersecurity safeguards applied to Anthropic's most capable models. It is available everywhere, including Amazon Bedrock, and Haiku 5.5 is expected in the coming weeks.
Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family, positioning it as a faster, lower-cost complement to Opus 5.5 for well-scoped coding and knowledge work. The company says it runs over 30% faster than Sonnet 5 and effectively costs up to 30% less per task despite identical per-token pricing, and it is the first Sonnet subject to the cybersecurity safeguards applied to Anthropic's most capable models. It is available everywhere, including Amazon Bedrock, and Haiku 5.5 is expected in the coming weeks.
Multiple independent developers benchmarked Anthropic's new Sonnet 5.5 against Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5 in Claude Code and pi-agent. Sonnet 5.5 matched Opus 5.5's pass rates while running roughly twice as fast and costing one-third to one-half as much, and one tester with skills loaded could not distinguish the two models. A separate comparison found Opus 5.5 itself takes far fewer steps and tokens than Opus 5.
Multiple independent developers benchmarked Anthropic's new Sonnet 5.5 against Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5 in Claude Code and pi-agent. Sonnet 5.5 matched Opus 5.5's pass rates while running roughly twice as fast and costing one-third to one-half as much, and one tester with skills loaded could not distinguish the two models. A separate comparison found Opus 5.5 itself takes far fewer steps and tokens than Opus 5.
A YouTube video from Matthew Berman covers the arrival of Claude Sonnet 5.5, showcasing five demo projects built with the model (Crownfall, Bounce Lab, Marrow Manor, Splatburst, DEADLOCK) plus two comparison builds against Sonnet 5. The video highlights what the new model can build in practice rather than reporting benchmark numbers.
A YouTube video from Matthew Berman covers the arrival of Claude Sonnet 5.5, showcasing five demo projects built with the model (Crownfall, Bounce Lab, Marrow Manor, Splatburst, DEADLOCK) plus two comparison builds against Sonnet 5. The video highlights what the new model can build in practice rather than reporting benchmark numbers.
Users digest Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 release, which set a new Artificial Analysis record for most output tokens and reportedly outperforms Opus 5.5 benchmarks on some tests. A community analysis of Anthropic's own prompting guide found Sonnet 5.5 scores lower at max effort than xhigh on a coding benchmark because extra code-review subagents make edits outside the task. The release landed a day before OpenAI's Dev Day, where OpenAI reportedly plans 20+ launches.
Users digest Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 release, which set a new Artificial Analysis record for most output tokens and reportedly outperforms Opus 5.5 benchmarks on some tests. A community analysis of Anthropic's own prompting guide found Sonnet 5.5 scores lower at max effort than xhigh on a coding benchmark because extra code-review subagents make edits outside the task. The release landed a day before OpenAI's Dev Day, where OpenAI reportedly plans 20+ launches.
A Reddit user ranks Claude Sonnet versions by guardrail behavior, placing Sonnet 4.6 above Sonnet 5.5 above Sonnet 5. They find Sonnet 5.5 less aggressive in censoring benign content than Sonnet 5 but less flexible than Sonnet 4.6, particularly for story generation. The post solicits community opinions on whether to send Anthropic feedback asking for looser policies.
A Reddit user ranks Claude Sonnet versions by guardrail behavior, placing Sonnet 4.6 above Sonnet 5.5 above Sonnet 5. They find Sonnet 5.5 less aggressive in censoring benign content than Sonnet 5 but less flexible than Sonnet 4.6, particularly for story generation. The post solicits community opinions on whether to send Anthropic feedback asking for looser policies.