A developer released a GitHub prompt engineered from 40+ sycophancy research papers and articles to counter Claude's tendency to agree rather than challenge users' ideas. The prompt makes Claude push back, search online when needed, pull real evidence, and flag weak reasoning. It matters to practitioners fighting model agreeableness in critical workflows.
Pushback is a Claude Code skill that turns Claude into a skeptical senior engineer, challenging premises and refusing to over-engineer. It includes a /roast command for brutal code review that identifies real bugs and provides fixes. Built as Markdown with zero dependencies, it installs by copying two folders.
Pushback is a Claude Code skill that turns Claude into a skeptical senior engineer, challenging premises and refusing to over-engineer. It includes a /roast command for brutal code review that identifies real bugs and provides fixes. Built as Markdown with zero dependencies, it installs by copying two folders.
An iOS philosophy learning app where learners interact with simulated thinkers like Aristotle instead of only reading texts. Claude powers the interactive dialogue, modeling a philosopher's worldview so users can ask questions and get responses. It targets people who struggle to retain philosophy from passive reading or videos.
An iOS philosophy learning app where learners interact with simulated thinkers like Aristotle instead of only reading texts. Claude powers the interactive dialogue, modeling a philosopher's worldview so users can ask questions and get responses. It targets people who struggle to retain philosophy from passive reading or videos.
A tool that uses LLMs to evaluate startup ideas by generating pros and cons, each justified with a source, so users can verify claims themselves rather than relying on AI's cheerleading. It addresses the problem of AI being overly supportive and helps founders make informed decisions.
A tool that uses LLMs to evaluate startup ideas by generating pros and cons, each justified with a source, so users can verify claims themselves rather than relying on AI's cheerleading. It addresses the problem of AI being overly supportive and helps founders make informed decisions.
A note-taking/brainstorming notebook with an AI assistant designed to counter sycophancy. The LLM is prompted and framed to critique, challenge weak arguments, and avoid drifting into agreement across turns. It targets people who want critical feedback during thinking and writing rather than a validating chat partner.
A note-taking/brainstorming notebook with an AI assistant designed to counter sycophancy. The LLM is prompted and framed to critique, challenge weak arguments, and avoid drifting into agreement across turns. It targets people who want critical feedback during thinking and writing rather than a validating chat partner.
A Reddit user describes using Claude with an adversarial-reviewer prompt to identify logical flaws in project ideas before starting, claiming it saved significant time. The thread invites others to share similar validation prompts, indicating growing community interest in using LLMs for critical feedback.
A Reddit user describes using Claude with an adversarial-reviewer prompt to identify logical flaws in project ideas before starting, claiming it saved significant time. The thread invites others to share similar validation prompts, indicating growing community interest in using LLMs for critical feedback.