A new GitHub project, jev-codex-router, adds per-turn model and reasoning routing for Codex using Jev (TypeSafe System One). Each turn is classified by Jev, which selects the cheapest capable model, thinking depth, and speed mode, instead of defaulting to a frontier model for everything. The author reports roughly 60% cost savings versus a full-frontier baseline on a 7-day replay of 237 real turns.
jev is a CLI built around TypeSafe AI's JEV, a small router model that reads a question and decides which LLM should answer it. It routes cheap/simple questions to cheaper models and complex ones to expensive models, cutting spend while keeping quality. On failure it falls back to a default tier so the request always completes.
jev is a CLI built around TypeSafe AI's JEV, a small router model that reads a question and decides which LLM should answer it. It routes cheap/simple questions to cheaper models and complex ones to expensive models, cutting spend while keeping quality. On failure it falls back to a default tier so the request always completes.
A Reddit user detailed replacing a keyword-rule router with Jev, a decision model, to route prompts across four local model tiers (3B to 26B MoE) served via LM Studio on an RTX 4060 Ti setup. The classifier picked the correct tier 16/16 on labeled prompts and caught refusals 15/15, costing roughly $0.0002 per routing decision. The writeup offers a practical template for multi-model local inference where a misroute forces a 15-45 second model swap.
A Reddit user detailed replacing a keyword-rule router with Jev, a decision model, to route prompts across four local model tiers (3B to 26B MoE) served via LM Studio on an RTX 4060 Ti setup. The classifier picked the correct tier 16/16 on labeled prompts and caught refusals 15/15, costing roughly $0.0002 per routing decision. The writeup offers a practical template for multi-model local inference where a misroute forces a 15-45 second model swap.
A practitioner argues that the wave of LLM routers from Ramp, Martian, Coinbase, Devin, and Cursor is misguided, claiming the real problem is token efficiency, not model routing. They contend benchmark-based routers are fundamentally flawed because benchmarks are maps, not routing tables.
A practitioner argues that the wave of LLM routers from Ramp, Martian, Coinbase, Devin, and Cursor is misguided, claiming the real problem is token efficiency, not model routing. They contend benchmark-based routers are fundamentally flawed because benchmarks are maps, not routing tables.